Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
More Police Punishing the Poor in the Pogonip
City Council is posed to rubberstamp another police state expansion of power giving NIMBY (Not-in-my-backyard) bureaucrats a green light, funds, and weapons against the poor.
TUESDAY AT 3 PM--ANOTHER ATTACK ON THE POOR
Coming up at the afternoon session of City Council is another expansion of police power in the Parks and Recreation Department, using street repair and park maintenance money from the increased sales tax to increase the crackdown on the homeless.
Item #15, which could come up as early as 3:05 PM, describes itself as "Park, Open Space and Waterway Security Program Using Measure H Funds"
"Motion to direct the Director of Parks and Recreation and the Chief of Police to work with the City Manager to create the necessary positions needed to implement Parks Security Divisions in the Parks and Recreation and Police Departments."
The City of Santa Cruz's 1500-2000 homeless people have access to emergency shelter with a capacity of 160 people. The rules also exclude those who work during the day, have pets, have health problems, or who lack photo ID.
Police issue $90 camping tickets for those they target, without checking whether there is any legal place they can actually go (almost always there isn't). So they violate the Federal principles laid down by the 9th Circuit Court in the Jones decision banning police arrest of the L.A. Skidrow homeless at night. (The principle was "no shelter available = no arrests permitted").
Parks and Rec ranger John Wallace has gone further. The entire SCPD only issued, according to information released under a Public Records Act request, about 30 citations per month from April to Decermber of 2006. Wallace singlehandedly has issued more citations.
Further Wallace has directed Public Works teams to come in and destroy homeless property as "garbage", including usable tents, blankets, and sleeping bags, as well as personal property. A Federal judge in Fresno in the Kincaid case has found such behavior unconstitutional; a trial for damages now awaits city authorities who authorized or permitted these human rights abuses.
[http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2006/11/23/18332519.php]
Likewise in Santa Cruz, such behavior is unconstitutional, abusive, unworthy of a civilized community, and a resurgence of the War Against the Poor locally. It also threatenes homeless survival in winter. Witnesses have testified they observed Wallace's supervising workers who systematically and regularly gather and then slash homeless gear with knives and then toss the scraps into dumpsters.
MORE MONEY FOR THE VANDALS
Police chief Skerry, P & R czarina Shoemaker, and City Manager-for-Life Dick Wilson now propose an expansion of these vicious raids on those without shelter.
Though written before December 13th (see below), the "Security Program" report was only released to the public seventy-two hours before the Council meeting. The Good Times did its part with a scare story demonizing surival campers in the downtown area. [http://www.gtweekly.com/news/story.2007-01-03.6678368356]
As usual there are no crime statistics either with the Good Times article or with the Council request for more "Homeland Security" forces here against the "escalating" "illegal" activities. This mirrors the approach used by Bush nationally (more troops, whatever the cost) and by the Public Works Department last year in passing the Parking Garage Paranoia Law (which they call the Parking Garage Trespass Law).
COLLATERAL ATTACKS ON THE HOMELESS AND RESTRICTIONS ON PUBLIC SPACES:
Last year City Council voted to give Schumaker the power to drive the homeless from the city parking garage structures (and Parking Lot #9 across from the Elmo St. Mission feeding program) with their Parking Garage Trespass Law. This law makes it illegal to enter a parking garage unless you are parking a car or bicycle or picking one up and then allows you only 15 minutes to do so.
The fine could be anywhere from $100 to $200. With the new expedited "no warrants" "speedy civil collection process", a $300 fine will be added if the fines are not immediately paid.
Signs in parking lots ban "loitering" (without specifying the ridiculous 15 minutes alloted to paying customers to hustle out of their cars and out of the parking lot). The promised "free speech" exceptions that would allow people to leave flyers on cars, for instance, have not yet materialized.
OTHER AGGRANDIZEMENTS OF POWER BY SHOEMAKER:
Smoking (of cannabis or tobacco) has been banned from all city parks--without any meaningful public process or reasonable discussion (such as allotting smoking areas to addicted tobacco smokers, or considering the needs of homeless medical marijuana patients).
The Parks and Recreation Commission, although usually a rubberstamping body, has been cut out of a process which now allows Shoemaker to unilaterally close down any area policed by Wallace and his associates (i.e. "set closing hours"). This includes areas along Pacific Avenue and the City Council grounds themselves.
SCAPEGOATING THE HOMELESS MAY HAVE FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCES
Creating new enemies for suvival camping and then criminalizing them does not pass the "straight face" test. But apparently it's business-as-usual with the City Council. Instead of designating camping areas, the City is imperiling the health and safety of the poorest by creating more police power to drive them deeper into the greenbelts. Instead of creating "safe camper" programs and acknowledging the unmet needs of our homeless population, the Reilly-Coonerty Council is pursuing a gentrification agenda which also makes the city legally vulnerable under the Jones and Kincaid decisions.
COUNCIL'S DONE DEAL MAKES "WITHIN THE SYSTEM" OPPOSITION DIFFICULT.
Folks can, of course, call City Council at 420-5020 and demand that more funds for thuggery be put on hold (just as more funding for additional troops in Iraq needs to be stopped).
The measure is coming up at an afternoon session when most of the community can't easily attend. It's being advanced as an "administrative business" item, which limits the amount of public discussion allowed (3 minutes if you haven't talked on any other administrative item, 1 minute if you have). It's being put forward without meaningful public notice.
It seems pretty clear that Mayor "Smiley" Reilly is ready to rubberstamp another police empowerment measure without considering its impact on the poor.
It's becoming clear that a combination of direct action and legal attacks are probably the only effective resistance, though letting Rotkin, Robinson, Reilly, and the rest know how you feel (same phone number as above) isn't a bad idea.
NIMBY-POLICE VIGILANTE COLLUSION AGAINST THE POOR?
Particularly ominous in the staff report is the suggestion that neighbors should "team up" with the police in snitching on the poor as part of the war on "illegal activity" (using the Drug War, of course, as the scare justification).
Not only is the whole procedure cruel, costly, coarsening, and toxic for the poor--it is useless. Last year there were more busts for marijuana than during any prior year (and Santa Cruz's Sheriff Robbins and D.A. Bob Lee continue to arrest and harass, in spite of Proposition 215), but are less people smoking marijuana. Will homeless people stop sleeping and camping because the harassment increases? Or will they simply so less safely, more secretly, and more fearfully?
The Scotts Valley anti-camping law goes into effect January 20th. More people died homeless in 2006 in Santa Cruz County than in any previous year, according to the official count.
ENVIRONMENTAL EXCUSES FOR EXPANDED POLICE POWER LAUGHABLE
It's bitterly ironic that part of the justification for this measure is to protect the environment, when the city is refusing to put in 24-hour bathrooms downtown (and engaging in a costly upgrade of the Lighthouse Field bathroom while ignoring needs elsewhere in the city).
All the downtown portapotties have been removed including the portapotty at the Farmer's Market--the last of the 5 put in under the Krohn-Sugar-Fitzmaurice administrations. The urinal in the men's room of the daytime bathroom on Soquel Avenue across from New Leaf Market has been torn out.
The previously public bathroom in the Locust St. garage is due to be privatized to protect the sensibilities of Public Works parking garage workers.
RESIST TWO WARS--THE WAR IN IRAQ AND THE WAR ON THE POOR
Meanwhile the Council remains silent with nothing on its agenda regarding the proposed murderous "surge" of troops in Iraq.
HUFF (Homeless United for Friendship & Freedom) urges community members to join the Vigil Against Two Wars--the War on Iraq and the War Against the Poor. Camping out at federal buildings like the post office, Farr's office, the FBI office downtown--would be a visible protest that would send a strong message.
Contact 423-4833 if you want to support such a drive.
BELOW IS THE STAFF REPORT SUPPORTING THE $700,000 POLICING MEASURE PROPOSED FOR THE PARKS (The actual cost is unclear since the report, interestingly enough, does not give specifics)
On-line Staff Report
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE: December 13, 2006
AGENDA OF: January 9, 2007
DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation Department and Police Department
SUBJECT: Park, Open Space and Waterway Security Program Using Measure H Funds
RECOMMENDATION: That City Council direct the Director of Parks and Recreation and the Chief of Police to work with the City Manager to create the necessary positions needed to implement Parks Security Divisions in the Parks and Recreation and Police Departments.
BACKGROUND: On Tuesday, November 7, 2006, Santa Cruz City residents approved Measure H. This ballot measure made permanent the five-year 1⁄4 cent sales tax rate passed by voters in 2002 and added a new 1⁄4 cent sales tax rate. The City Council, in conjunction with its placement of Measure H on the ballot, adopted a resolution stating that the City Council’s intent was that the City would use the additional revenue generated by the new 1⁄4 cent sales tax rate for street maintenance and repairs and City Park maintenance, supervision and public safety.
DISCUSSION: Over the past few years the City has experienced increasing challenges with the condition of its parks, open space and waterways. Existing City staff has tried to cope with the accumulation of garbage and camping debris and escalating illegal activities in the City’s parklands by combining Parks and Recreation and Police Department resources along with contractual labor to deal with the most egregious illegal campsites.
Illegal activities, including drug dealing and use, prostitution, illegal camping and garbage dumping are evident in the majority of the City’s parks, open spaces and waterways. Not only do these activities pose public safety issues, they also present public health and environmental challenges. In addition, the illegal activities also discourage law-abiding citizens from using the City facilities.
The problems described above have escalated over the last four years because of an actual increase in the amount of illegal activities as well as a decrease in security and maintenance staff.
The model of pairing the existing park ranger with a police officer was very effective in addressing some of the illegal activities over the past several months, but due to limited resources, the illegal activity just moved from one site to another.
Given the level of illegal activity in our parks, open space and waterways, staff recommends developing a staffing program that combines Park Rangers and Police Department Community Service Officers. The Community Service Officers and their supervisor will be assigned full time to parks, open space and waterways, and will be focused on curtailing illegal activities specifically in neighborhood parks and the River Levee. The Park Rangers and their supervisor will coordinate parks, open space and waterway cleanups, and provide some routine maintenance in the open space areas of the parks system. The Rangers will also provide interpretive services and work with neighbors throughout the park system. In addition to the CSO’s, Rangers and supervisors hired with Measure H funds, Parks Maintenance Workers will also be hired as well as purchasing necessary equipment and supplies. Both units will work together to make our parks, open space and waterways safer and cleaner for all.
Recruitment for some of the positions will take months so it is staff’s intent to begin recruitment after the first of the year so that appointments can be made as soon as the funding becomes available. Staff will return to City Council with a budget adjustment and a final staffing plan.
FISCAL IMPACT: Measure H funding will become available in April. The additional 1⁄4 cent will generate approximately $2.4 million per year of which approximately $700,000 will be available for parks, open space and waterway security and maintenance annually.
Submitted by: Dannettee Shoemaker Director of Parks and Recreation
Approved by: Richard C. Wilson City Manager
Submitted by: Howard Skerry Chief of Police
Coming up at the afternoon session of City Council is another expansion of police power in the Parks and Recreation Department, using street repair and park maintenance money from the increased sales tax to increase the crackdown on the homeless.
Item #15, which could come up as early as 3:05 PM, describes itself as "Park, Open Space and Waterway Security Program Using Measure H Funds"
"Motion to direct the Director of Parks and Recreation and the Chief of Police to work with the City Manager to create the necessary positions needed to implement Parks Security Divisions in the Parks and Recreation and Police Departments."
The City of Santa Cruz's 1500-2000 homeless people have access to emergency shelter with a capacity of 160 people. The rules also exclude those who work during the day, have pets, have health problems, or who lack photo ID.
Police issue $90 camping tickets for those they target, without checking whether there is any legal place they can actually go (almost always there isn't). So they violate the Federal principles laid down by the 9th Circuit Court in the Jones decision banning police arrest of the L.A. Skidrow homeless at night. (The principle was "no shelter available = no arrests permitted").
Parks and Rec ranger John Wallace has gone further. The entire SCPD only issued, according to information released under a Public Records Act request, about 30 citations per month from April to Decermber of 2006. Wallace singlehandedly has issued more citations.
Further Wallace has directed Public Works teams to come in and destroy homeless property as "garbage", including usable tents, blankets, and sleeping bags, as well as personal property. A Federal judge in Fresno in the Kincaid case has found such behavior unconstitutional; a trial for damages now awaits city authorities who authorized or permitted these human rights abuses.
[http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2006/11/23/18332519.php]
Likewise in Santa Cruz, such behavior is unconstitutional, abusive, unworthy of a civilized community, and a resurgence of the War Against the Poor locally. It also threatenes homeless survival in winter. Witnesses have testified they observed Wallace's supervising workers who systematically and regularly gather and then slash homeless gear with knives and then toss the scraps into dumpsters.
MORE MONEY FOR THE VANDALS
Police chief Skerry, P & R czarina Shoemaker, and City Manager-for-Life Dick Wilson now propose an expansion of these vicious raids on those without shelter.
Though written before December 13th (see below), the "Security Program" report was only released to the public seventy-two hours before the Council meeting. The Good Times did its part with a scare story demonizing surival campers in the downtown area. [http://www.gtweekly.com/news/story.2007-01-03.6678368356]
As usual there are no crime statistics either with the Good Times article or with the Council request for more "Homeland Security" forces here against the "escalating" "illegal" activities. This mirrors the approach used by Bush nationally (more troops, whatever the cost) and by the Public Works Department last year in passing the Parking Garage Paranoia Law (which they call the Parking Garage Trespass Law).
COLLATERAL ATTACKS ON THE HOMELESS AND RESTRICTIONS ON PUBLIC SPACES:
Last year City Council voted to give Schumaker the power to drive the homeless from the city parking garage structures (and Parking Lot #9 across from the Elmo St. Mission feeding program) with their Parking Garage Trespass Law. This law makes it illegal to enter a parking garage unless you are parking a car or bicycle or picking one up and then allows you only 15 minutes to do so.
The fine could be anywhere from $100 to $200. With the new expedited "no warrants" "speedy civil collection process", a $300 fine will be added if the fines are not immediately paid.
Signs in parking lots ban "loitering" (without specifying the ridiculous 15 minutes alloted to paying customers to hustle out of their cars and out of the parking lot). The promised "free speech" exceptions that would allow people to leave flyers on cars, for instance, have not yet materialized.
OTHER AGGRANDIZEMENTS OF POWER BY SHOEMAKER:
Smoking (of cannabis or tobacco) has been banned from all city parks--without any meaningful public process or reasonable discussion (such as allotting smoking areas to addicted tobacco smokers, or considering the needs of homeless medical marijuana patients).
The Parks and Recreation Commission, although usually a rubberstamping body, has been cut out of a process which now allows Shoemaker to unilaterally close down any area policed by Wallace and his associates (i.e. "set closing hours"). This includes areas along Pacific Avenue and the City Council grounds themselves.
SCAPEGOATING THE HOMELESS MAY HAVE FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCES
Creating new enemies for suvival camping and then criminalizing them does not pass the "straight face" test. But apparently it's business-as-usual with the City Council. Instead of designating camping areas, the City is imperiling the health and safety of the poorest by creating more police power to drive them deeper into the greenbelts. Instead of creating "safe camper" programs and acknowledging the unmet needs of our homeless population, the Reilly-Coonerty Council is pursuing a gentrification agenda which also makes the city legally vulnerable under the Jones and Kincaid decisions.
COUNCIL'S DONE DEAL MAKES "WITHIN THE SYSTEM" OPPOSITION DIFFICULT.
Folks can, of course, call City Council at 420-5020 and demand that more funds for thuggery be put on hold (just as more funding for additional troops in Iraq needs to be stopped).
The measure is coming up at an afternoon session when most of the community can't easily attend. It's being advanced as an "administrative business" item, which limits the amount of public discussion allowed (3 minutes if you haven't talked on any other administrative item, 1 minute if you have). It's being put forward without meaningful public notice.
It seems pretty clear that Mayor "Smiley" Reilly is ready to rubberstamp another police empowerment measure without considering its impact on the poor.
It's becoming clear that a combination of direct action and legal attacks are probably the only effective resistance, though letting Rotkin, Robinson, Reilly, and the rest know how you feel (same phone number as above) isn't a bad idea.
NIMBY-POLICE VIGILANTE COLLUSION AGAINST THE POOR?
Particularly ominous in the staff report is the suggestion that neighbors should "team up" with the police in snitching on the poor as part of the war on "illegal activity" (using the Drug War, of course, as the scare justification).
Not only is the whole procedure cruel, costly, coarsening, and toxic for the poor--it is useless. Last year there were more busts for marijuana than during any prior year (and Santa Cruz's Sheriff Robbins and D.A. Bob Lee continue to arrest and harass, in spite of Proposition 215), but are less people smoking marijuana. Will homeless people stop sleeping and camping because the harassment increases? Or will they simply so less safely, more secretly, and more fearfully?
The Scotts Valley anti-camping law goes into effect January 20th. More people died homeless in 2006 in Santa Cruz County than in any previous year, according to the official count.
ENVIRONMENTAL EXCUSES FOR EXPANDED POLICE POWER LAUGHABLE
It's bitterly ironic that part of the justification for this measure is to protect the environment, when the city is refusing to put in 24-hour bathrooms downtown (and engaging in a costly upgrade of the Lighthouse Field bathroom while ignoring needs elsewhere in the city).
All the downtown portapotties have been removed including the portapotty at the Farmer's Market--the last of the 5 put in under the Krohn-Sugar-Fitzmaurice administrations. The urinal in the men's room of the daytime bathroom on Soquel Avenue across from New Leaf Market has been torn out.
The previously public bathroom in the Locust St. garage is due to be privatized to protect the sensibilities of Public Works parking garage workers.
RESIST TWO WARS--THE WAR IN IRAQ AND THE WAR ON THE POOR
Meanwhile the Council remains silent with nothing on its agenda regarding the proposed murderous "surge" of troops in Iraq.
HUFF (Homeless United for Friendship & Freedom) urges community members to join the Vigil Against Two Wars--the War on Iraq and the War Against the Poor. Camping out at federal buildings like the post office, Farr's office, the FBI office downtown--would be a visible protest that would send a strong message.
Contact 423-4833 if you want to support such a drive.
BELOW IS THE STAFF REPORT SUPPORTING THE $700,000 POLICING MEASURE PROPOSED FOR THE PARKS (The actual cost is unclear since the report, interestingly enough, does not give specifics)
On-line Staff Report
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE: December 13, 2006
AGENDA OF: January 9, 2007
DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation Department and Police Department
SUBJECT: Park, Open Space and Waterway Security Program Using Measure H Funds
RECOMMENDATION: That City Council direct the Director of Parks and Recreation and the Chief of Police to work with the City Manager to create the necessary positions needed to implement Parks Security Divisions in the Parks and Recreation and Police Departments.
BACKGROUND: On Tuesday, November 7, 2006, Santa Cruz City residents approved Measure H. This ballot measure made permanent the five-year 1⁄4 cent sales tax rate passed by voters in 2002 and added a new 1⁄4 cent sales tax rate. The City Council, in conjunction with its placement of Measure H on the ballot, adopted a resolution stating that the City Council’s intent was that the City would use the additional revenue generated by the new 1⁄4 cent sales tax rate for street maintenance and repairs and City Park maintenance, supervision and public safety.
DISCUSSION: Over the past few years the City has experienced increasing challenges with the condition of its parks, open space and waterways. Existing City staff has tried to cope with the accumulation of garbage and camping debris and escalating illegal activities in the City’s parklands by combining Parks and Recreation and Police Department resources along with contractual labor to deal with the most egregious illegal campsites.
Illegal activities, including drug dealing and use, prostitution, illegal camping and garbage dumping are evident in the majority of the City’s parks, open spaces and waterways. Not only do these activities pose public safety issues, they also present public health and environmental challenges. In addition, the illegal activities also discourage law-abiding citizens from using the City facilities.
The problems described above have escalated over the last four years because of an actual increase in the amount of illegal activities as well as a decrease in security and maintenance staff.
The model of pairing the existing park ranger with a police officer was very effective in addressing some of the illegal activities over the past several months, but due to limited resources, the illegal activity just moved from one site to another.
Given the level of illegal activity in our parks, open space and waterways, staff recommends developing a staffing program that combines Park Rangers and Police Department Community Service Officers. The Community Service Officers and their supervisor will be assigned full time to parks, open space and waterways, and will be focused on curtailing illegal activities specifically in neighborhood parks and the River Levee. The Park Rangers and their supervisor will coordinate parks, open space and waterway cleanups, and provide some routine maintenance in the open space areas of the parks system. The Rangers will also provide interpretive services and work with neighbors throughout the park system. In addition to the CSO’s, Rangers and supervisors hired with Measure H funds, Parks Maintenance Workers will also be hired as well as purchasing necessary equipment and supplies. Both units will work together to make our parks, open space and waterways safer and cleaner for all.
Recruitment for some of the positions will take months so it is staff’s intent to begin recruitment after the first of the year so that appointments can be made as soon as the funding becomes available. Staff will return to City Council with a budget adjustment and a final staffing plan.
FISCAL IMPACT: Measure H funding will become available in April. The additional 1⁄4 cent will generate approximately $2.4 million per year of which approximately $700,000 will be available for parks, open space and waterway security and maintenance annually.
Submitted by: Dannettee Shoemaker Director of Parks and Recreation
Approved by: Richard C. Wilson City Manager
Submitted by: Howard Skerry Chief of Police
Add Your Comments
Comments (Hide Comments)
Tuesday Jan 9th, 2007 11:58 AM
Wanna host a Free Skool class that deliberately challenges some of these laws directly targeting the poor and homeless? Locally, I'd like to see greater Homeless Resistance, an upswelling of rebellion from the most put-upon class of people in our community. I'm not homeless, but I'd like to help homeless people self-organize without being patronizing. But ultimately, a successful rebellion has to come from within the homeless community.
Suggestions?
Suggestions?
Tuesday Jan 9th, 2007 1:12 PM
Excellent idea, particularly with the Jones decision currently ruling precedent in the 9-state area including California. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in April that banning nighttime sleeping on public property without adequate alternative shelter is cruel and unusual punishment.
HUFF (Homeless United for Friendship & Freedom) meets every Wednesday morning 9:30-11:30 AM in the American Cafe at 701 Ocean St. in the basement of the County Building.
Perhaps that's a tad early, but one meetings are always open to prioritize resistance strategies for folks who show up (particularly newcomers).
I'd also be happy to work with anyone else who wants to work on this project and schedule it at another time. Let me know at 423-4833 or rnorse3 [at] hotmail.com.
A creative campout in front of Coonertyland (Bookshop Santa Cruz) might be helpful in persuading Coonerty Jr. (Vice-Mayor) and Coonerty, Sr. (Supervisor) to follow the Constitution. We could do some training there downtown in full view of shoppers and merchants. Any volunteers?
HUFF (Homeless United for Friendship & Freedom) meets every Wednesday morning 9:30-11:30 AM in the American Cafe at 701 Ocean St. in the basement of the County Building.
Perhaps that's a tad early, but one meetings are always open to prioritize resistance strategies for folks who show up (particularly newcomers).
I'd also be happy to work with anyone else who wants to work on this project and schedule it at another time. Let me know at 423-4833 or rnorse3 [at] hotmail.com.
A creative campout in front of Coonertyland (Bookshop Santa Cruz) might be helpful in persuading Coonerty Jr. (Vice-Mayor) and Coonerty, Sr. (Supervisor) to follow the Constitution. We could do some training there downtown in full view of shoppers and merchants. Any volunteers?
Tuesday Jan 9th, 2007 3:03 PM
Great article, Robert. Thank you for keeping your eye on these issues and letting people know what new oppression the bureaucrats are cooking up now. I have to say, though, I don't know how much good it will be talking to this Council. Fitzmaurice and Madrigal were the most sympathetic to homeless issues. I knew we couldn't expect much from Lynn Robinson, but didn't expect her to bitch about the rest of the Council's vote to support war resister, Ehren Watada. She is Queen of the NIMBYs. I already miss Fitzmaurice.
Now about a protest at "Coonertyland" (Bookshop Santa Cruz). Wouldn't it make more sense to do the protest at the County or City Council buildings??? Bookshop is the ONLY downtown business that I know of that actually providespublic bathrooms. I don't appreciate a lot of Ryan Coonerty's decisions, but I do give credit to Pops for still being a human being and providing this basic human service to people. (Junior could learn a thing or two from Pops in this area, I think....)
Now about a protest at "Coonertyland" (Bookshop Santa Cruz). Wouldn't it make more sense to do the protest at the County or City Council buildings??? Bookshop is the ONLY downtown business that I know of that actually providespublic bathrooms. I don't appreciate a lot of Ryan Coonerty's decisions, but I do give credit to Pops for still being a human being and providing this basic human service to people. (Junior could learn a thing or two from Pops in this area, I think....)
Tuesday Jan 9th, 2007 3:37 PM
NO WAR BUT CLASS WAR!!
Wednesday Jan 10th, 2007 10:23 PM
With less than 15 minutes discussion, the Reilly Council rubberstamped the Skerry-Wilson- Shoemaker Bumbuster Patrols.
When I spoke at the meeting, P & R boss Shoemaker freely acknowledged the matter had not been brought before a Parks and Recreation Commission. She and her staff had not heard from any significant social service provider, homeless advocate, health worker, or homeless camper.
Most significant for those champeoning police solutions to "illegal camping" problems, she had no record of the alleged "illegal" activities which this huge infusion of more money was supposed to cure. Even though a line-up of police heads (Chief Skerry, Deputy Chief Vogel, and others) were in the backrow, Council didn't ask one question about the actual incidence of "illegal activities" in the Pogonip, and what percentage of the citations there were for survival camping (where there was no alternative shelter).
At City Council, Shoemaker bragged about teaming up cops with the ticket-happy Ranger John
Wallace. How they had successfully run "problems" out of San Lorenzo Park, Grant St. Park, and the other parks, though there was the troublesome admission that the problems then popped up elsewhere. It was interesting to note, as mentioned in the main post, that during the same period of time Pastor Dennis Adams's Sunday morning homeless meal was driven out of San Lorenzo Park and then Grant St.
[Adams is currently struggling to return the meal to the basement of the Vet's Hall, whose management reportedly is under the control of a management more concerned with making money by renting out the space to outside groups like Yoga classes and has told Adams that his homeless clients "dirty up" the bathrooms. Adams claims his clients actually leave the place spotless and clean up the mess that the profit-making Saturday night events leave behind. When he tried to feed people in the Vet's Parking Lot, Officer Brandt threatened to arrest them for trespass. In December when Adams moved his meal to the City Parking Garage because of the rain and no place else to go, Adams was threatened with arrest under Councilmember Coonerty's Parking Garage Paranoia Law]
Porter chided critics for not "coming to the process earlier" (though advocates have been at the few difficult-to-attend afternoon sessions where this issue had some attention last year). He insisted the issue had been given adequate process, even though the citizen advisory commission specifically charged with examining the matter had not been approached for a formal vote.
Reilly refused HUFF the five minutes usually allowed for organizations discussing agenda items (though she said that if approached in advance in future, it would be allowed).
Neither Ken Cole, Paul Brindel, nor any social service provider apbothered to show at the Council meeting to discuss the impact of intensifying the criminalization of those without shelter.
I shall be playing the City Council's "discussion" of the issue Thursday January 11 around 7 PM on Free Radio Santa Cruz (101.1 FM, http://www.freakradio.org). It'll be archived at http://www.huffsantacruz.org under the Bathrobespierre's Broadside show of the same date.
When I spoke at the meeting, P & R boss Shoemaker freely acknowledged the matter had not been brought before a Parks and Recreation Commission. She and her staff had not heard from any significant social service provider, homeless advocate, health worker, or homeless camper.
Most significant for those champeoning police solutions to "illegal camping" problems, she had no record of the alleged "illegal" activities which this huge infusion of more money was supposed to cure. Even though a line-up of police heads (Chief Skerry, Deputy Chief Vogel, and others) were in the backrow, Council didn't ask one question about the actual incidence of "illegal activities" in the Pogonip, and what percentage of the citations there were for survival camping (where there was no alternative shelter).
At City Council, Shoemaker bragged about teaming up cops with the ticket-happy Ranger John
Wallace. How they had successfully run "problems" out of San Lorenzo Park, Grant St. Park, and the other parks, though there was the troublesome admission that the problems then popped up elsewhere. It was interesting to note, as mentioned in the main post, that during the same period of time Pastor Dennis Adams's Sunday morning homeless meal was driven out of San Lorenzo Park and then Grant St.
[Adams is currently struggling to return the meal to the basement of the Vet's Hall, whose management reportedly is under the control of a management more concerned with making money by renting out the space to outside groups like Yoga classes and has told Adams that his homeless clients "dirty up" the bathrooms. Adams claims his clients actually leave the place spotless and clean up the mess that the profit-making Saturday night events leave behind. When he tried to feed people in the Vet's Parking Lot, Officer Brandt threatened to arrest them for trespass. In December when Adams moved his meal to the City Parking Garage because of the rain and no place else to go, Adams was threatened with arrest under Councilmember Coonerty's Parking Garage Paranoia Law]
Porter chided critics for not "coming to the process earlier" (though advocates have been at the few difficult-to-attend afternoon sessions where this issue had some attention last year). He insisted the issue had been given adequate process, even though the citizen advisory commission specifically charged with examining the matter had not been approached for a formal vote.
Reilly refused HUFF the five minutes usually allowed for organizations discussing agenda items (though she said that if approached in advance in future, it would be allowed).
Neither Ken Cole, Paul Brindel, nor any social service provider apbothered to show at the Council meeting to discuss the impact of intensifying the criminalization of those without shelter.
I shall be playing the City Council's "discussion" of the issue Thursday January 11 around 7 PM on Free Radio Santa Cruz (101.1 FM, http://www.freakradio.org). It'll be archived at http://www.huffsantacruz.org under the Bathrobespierre's Broadside show of the same date.
Thursday Jan 11th, 2007 10:04 PM
Just a thought:
If the homeless folks don't have money
If the homeless folks are refused places to sleep by the City
If the homeless folks are refused places to eat by the City
Why not have a huge arrest situation where the homeless and their allies are all taken in under the slogan, "Take is to Jail. At lease then we'll have something to eat and someplace to sleep!"
Pulling out the old Wobbly tactic from the Spokane, WA soapboxing struggle, load the jails 'til there isn't any more room and the city will be forced to find some sort of solution, which could, at the minimum, free up some space for people to sleep and eat in the public, if not more.
If the homeless folks don't have money
If the homeless folks are refused places to sleep by the City
If the homeless folks are refused places to eat by the City
Why not have a huge arrest situation where the homeless and their allies are all taken in under the slogan, "Take is to Jail. At lease then we'll have something to eat and someplace to sleep!"
Pulling out the old Wobbly tactic from the Spokane, WA soapboxing struggle, load the jails 'til there isn't any more room and the city will be forced to find some sort of solution, which could, at the minimum, free up some space for people to sleep and eat in the public, if not more.
Sunday Jan 14th, 2007 12:07 PM
HUFF activists have obtained MC 6.36.010 citations from the Santa Cruz Police Department and the Santa Cruz Parks and Recreation Department have issued 433 citations primarily to homeless people SINCE April 11, 2006 - Dec 11, 2006. All of these citations have been issued since the 9th Circuit Court ruled that outlawing sleeping at night constituted cruel and unusual punishment in cities which have inadequate shelter.
While the SCPD issued 168 citations, or about 18-19 a month, Ranger Wallace of Parks and Rec issued 265 citations by himself!! At this rate, the city issues nearly 600 tickets annually to homeless people---each and every one of them a potential litigant.
Since Councilmember Mike Rotkin keeps insisting that tickets are issued "only on complaint" and there is rarely a complaint associated with a Parks and Rec originated citation, so this is almost proof positive that Rotkin's claim is false.
Regardless of the legal situation, arresting people for sleeping or keeping warm with a blanket IS cruel and unusual punishment for the state of being too poor to afford a motel room. A state that city fathers and mothers such as Rotkin are partly responsible for.
While the SCPD issued 168 citations, or about 18-19 a month, Ranger Wallace of Parks and Rec issued 265 citations by himself!! At this rate, the city issues nearly 600 tickets annually to homeless people---each and every one of them a potential litigant.
Since Councilmember Mike Rotkin keeps insisting that tickets are issued "only on complaint" and there is rarely a complaint associated with a Parks and Rec originated citation, so this is almost proof positive that Rotkin's claim is false.
Regardless of the legal situation, arresting people for sleeping or keeping warm with a blanket IS cruel and unusual punishment for the state of being too poor to afford a motel room. A state that city fathers and mothers such as Rotkin are partly responsible for.
Sunday Jan 14th, 2007 9:43 PM
I know its easy to say and hard to do, but I really feel its time for some real direct action with the homeless and concerned activists and people to get involved. Its hard to get anyone to take such action and with the homeless its even more difficult, they are busy surviving or may have warrants -- there are many issues that make convincing the homeless to stand up against the war on poverty, which is what it is. I do not believe that ending the sleeping ban or changing ordinances will happen through using the system, its a war. It does help to fight it anyway you can but its been long enough. I do believe the homeless can stand up and what we need to is something like this, please bare with this, it is an idea and not a perfectly thought out one I use it to make a point.
1) Organize a camp out at Pogonip; we make a camp in plane sight.
We name it and have clear goals with a mission statement. It will be a protest camp and as large as possible. We have clear goals, a posted mission statement.
2) We fill it with activists and homeless with cheap disposable cameras for all. Some will bring better cameras and video.
3) We post signs to make it clear we are protesting. We have things there of value… Eventually we will get kicked out but we stick it out until they force us, we all take the tickets or go to jail so we can fight them. If they destroy property we take pictures. If we have to go to jail we do - unless during organizing we find it would benefit us more to use sleeping ban tickets better then resisting arrest.
3) We watch ranger Wallace who has given out more sleeping ban tickets then all the city cops combined, mostly in the Pogonip while were camping. We document and get evidence of property abuse and civil and human rights abuse as they did in Fresno, which Robert and Mike Rhodes have written about here on Indybay.
4) We camp responsibly and help and teach / promote others to do the same. We have teach ins on camping responsibly and campers forming there own clean up crews who become sort of stewards of this beautiful area.
5) We clean up trash while were there
6) We get as much media as we possible can
7) We use tactics such as handcuffing yourself to a tree or whatever your willing to do.
Getting the homeless to do this is hard but I have faith and have talked to many who are willing to take such an action. It will take allot of willing people.
I am wiling are you?
1) Organize a camp out at Pogonip; we make a camp in plane sight.
We name it and have clear goals with a mission statement. It will be a protest camp and as large as possible. We have clear goals, a posted mission statement.
2) We fill it with activists and homeless with cheap disposable cameras for all. Some will bring better cameras and video.
3) We post signs to make it clear we are protesting. We have things there of value… Eventually we will get kicked out but we stick it out until they force us, we all take the tickets or go to jail so we can fight them. If they destroy property we take pictures. If we have to go to jail we do - unless during organizing we find it would benefit us more to use sleeping ban tickets better then resisting arrest.
3) We watch ranger Wallace who has given out more sleeping ban tickets then all the city cops combined, mostly in the Pogonip while were camping. We document and get evidence of property abuse and civil and human rights abuse as they did in Fresno, which Robert and Mike Rhodes have written about here on Indybay.
4) We camp responsibly and help and teach / promote others to do the same. We have teach ins on camping responsibly and campers forming there own clean up crews who become sort of stewards of this beautiful area.
5) We clean up trash while were there
6) We get as much media as we possible can
7) We use tactics such as handcuffing yourself to a tree or whatever your willing to do.
Getting the homeless to do this is hard but I have faith and have talked to many who are willing to take such an action. It will take allot of willing people.
I am wiling are you?
Monday Jan 15th, 2007 5:56 PM
I absolutely agree with the former comment- lets organize a sleep-in. Anyone interested can drop an email. However, details should be discussed in person.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$ 117.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network